Subversive Network Member no. 184.108.40.2061?
If you look at the list of subversive members (http://www.exhibit24.net/net1.htm) there is a gap where no.220.127.116.111 should be. The names above and below this gap are 'trenchrun' and 'trentcolep', indicating that the missing member's name could be 'trent'. I dunno if this could mean anything at all, just an interesting observation i made. -- x1z.lachy, 15:33 2nd October 2007
-- x1z.lachy, 12:27 3rd October 2007
It is suspected that Exhibit Twenty Four is a "catch-up" site, listing all of and linking to the ARG sites in order to provide a back-story research point to people just joining the ARG.
At least, that's my theory, and I'm sticking to it.
--That probably is the case, plus a couple of new ideas are introduced into the fold.
Actually, I'm unconvinced. There could be more than one classified person - there are three mentions of "classified" - the one mentioned at 24.11.2's entry could well be TR, but the other two not. Until we have cast iron evidence, then this is personal opinion and you should probably remove the [CLASSIFIED] part from the wiki page and put it into this talk page instead!
It's nothing personal, it's simply because this is personal opinion and not cold, hard fact!
any body else suspect that this simply refers to http://www.anotherversionofthetruth.com/violent.htm? ylbissop 19:51, 28 April 2007 (PDT)
YES! but i doubt Reznor/the company is humble enough to switch it now that we've seen it and will subsequently make a new page lol Jgrizzy89 19:59, 29 April 2007 (PDT)
But why didn't they put down the other fourm topics? Blank 20:40, 7 May 2007 (PDT)
all other fourm topics are linked directly from AnotherVersionoftheTruth.com ylbissop 06:27, 27 May 2007 (PDT)
But so is /violent Blank 02:02, 28 May 2007 (PDT)
perhaps to draw attention to ballgameover.mp3 ? ylbissop 21:35, 28 May 2007 (PDT)
Yeah, maybe, I'm not in the mood to argue Blank 23:51, 28 May 2007 (PDT)
24.5.2 lists www.OpenSourceResistance.net as "Archived version of a notorious dissident site that began operation in 2007." Not "BA -15"? (28 April 2007 23:17 PST J.theYellow)
Many people involved in the Year Zero Experience often believe that the Pilgrims sent back these sites with the numbers stamped on them as part of the glitches and "static" that were part of sending these sites back through time, but it now seems that the "24.xx.xx" numbers were there to begin with, hence the name "Exhibit 24". Where exactly that I'm going with this is that perhaps the government put the numbers on the sites and videos as part of a nationwide internet cataloging system to help target the sites marked as "subversive" and the certain [uncredited] individuals who run these domains. If these numbers had been added by the scientists at SBI, how would this site catalog them as it does, and still have the "corrupted" look of being sent back by the Pilgrims? How would such numbers be spoken in recordings of government officials (such as the call from Free Rebel Art) pertaining to warning codes created to catch the "rebels" red-handed? Although, the same numbers in morse code appear in the recordings on the AVOTT forums. Perhaps they don't realize how close the government is watching them? If a cataloging system is the case, and this is the end of the 24th exhibit, perhaps there's an "Exhibit 25"? Further evidence: There is no unique, unmentioned number visible on this site, perhaps they believe that if they work for the government that they are completely loyal?
Yet another theory: all the AVOTT mp3's are said to be "broadcasts". Maybe they were actually heard on radio? And perhaps there's a site for some type of "underground broadcasting", as once before done by Neil Czerno (mentioned on The Price Of Treason)? -- BJW 15:23, 21 May 2009 (PDT)
Capital G Garageband?
Which stem track has the pictures hidden in it? Knotrice 04:58, 17 May 2010 (PDT)