Those links you posted I won't mention the brute force attempts on [[Year Zero the Research]] are obviously not related page percisly for that reason. If new sites get put up at a later date, it would be nice to have people checking the ARG in any way. Different registrars, no mentions of Year Zero events, etc. A passing similarity in name -- "zero sum" -- in no wise indicates anything but a coincidental naming schemesubnets again. [[User:TextFieldBurner|TextFieldBurner]]
:Please do not place If you'd like, you can put aside the brute force new-page search information and help us try to figure out another mystery: [[The_Mailstrom#Wreckages]] the cleansing shard is still unknown. We suspect someone who went to a listening party earlier on and who is ignorant of the ARG or of at least the clues in the Wikibuttons has it since they were handed out in vary limited supply. The page will be http://themailstrom.com/cleansing_******. I appreciate finding htm where the site and all, but it*'s simply not necessaray for the folks who are using this as an information sourcealphanumeric value (A-Z or 0-9), case INSENSITIVE. (If you'd be willing to help brute force that, I'm already not too keen d apperciate it :P Less drama on posting the IPs forums, and last-modified dates but thats a different argumentwe'll probally find clues to sites/subpages.that are active on it as opposed to still in transit..). Thanks --[[User:BurnHavoc|BurnHavoc]] 05:28, 20 April 2007 (PDT)
:YeahOh, the backlash from the IRC and ETS is getting pretty uglyyou might want to check this out: http://www. Alot of people don't agree with the way it's being done in finding the sitesechoingthesound. Since theres nothing actually ON the site, and I KNOW a good quarter of the sites were found far before their times through various means (not including the ones from the early-release CDs)org/phpbbx/viewtopic. Nontheless, most users won'php?t know what a Bash shell is and considering the general distaste for the method I'm trying to keep a balance between the viewpoints. as such=22230 --[[User:BurnHavoc|BurnHavoc]] 06:53, no Wiki info on the subject of bruteforce, but the results and mention that it was the method used 20 April 2007 (for the time being until the REAL clue is found) will be posted on the Wiki and on the ETS forums. I have to slap SPOLIER tags everywhere, but your work IS appreciated by me at least. (BTW, if you use 4 ~'s at the end of your posts the Wiki automatically does the signature you see to the right->PDT) :Any progress with anything? :D --[[User:BurnHavoc|BurnHavoc]] 0614:2102, 20 23 April 2007 (PDT)