Difference between revisions of "Talk:That's What I Get"
(Bias) |
m (→Bias) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Why are the descriptions of the song so negative, disparagingly quoting the notion that the song has melody, describing the use of steel drum samples as "excessive". It's completely unnecessary opinion. | Why are the descriptions of the song so negative, disparagingly quoting the notion that the song has melody, describing the use of steel drum samples as "excessive". It's completely unnecessary opinion. | ||
+ | :I'd never think ninwiki would be accused of NEGATIVE bias, to me the description of the song is simply stating the simplicity in the original mix, but if you can think of an accurate way to word it that would be more fair I doubt anyone would complain. [[User:Sheepdean|sheepdean]] [[User_talk:Sheepdean|Try to speak as clearly as you can]] 07:26, 4 November 2009 (PST) |
Latest revision as of 15:26, 4 November 2009
Should I add the other demo I found? Blank 21:30, 8 May 2007 (PDT)
- Can you verify its authenticity? I would add information about it on this page for starters, and if someone thinks it could be used in the article, it can be added. Can you also provide somee information on it? Where did you find it?--Leo3375 21:51, 8 May 2007 (PDT)
Sorry, got a bit confused. i got the wrong song. Sorry. Blank 23:01, 9 May 2007 (PDT)
Bias
Why are the descriptions of the song so negative, disparagingly quoting the notion that the song has melody, describing the use of steel drum samples as "excessive". It's completely unnecessary opinion.
- I'd never think ninwiki would be accused of NEGATIVE bias, to me the description of the song is simply stating the simplicity in the original mix, but if you can think of an accurate way to word it that would be more fair I doubt anyone would complain. sheepdean Try to speak as clearly as you can 07:26, 4 November 2009 (PST)