Changes

Talk:Year Zero Numbers (view source)

Revision as of 16:12, 13 March 2007

705 bytes added , 16:12, 13 March 2007

if so, then maybe the number sequence still makes some sense?--[[User:Killjoy|killjoy]] 00:32, 13 March 2007 (PDT)

: Going on that theory, I'd find it more plausible that those 6-8 lines correspond to the various texts we've found references to. --[[User:Mr z|Mr z]] 07:51, 13 March 2007 (PDT)

:: The snippets of text bleeding through the various pages are a product of the Pilgrims Expierement from SBI (The Flash IRC Conversation rather explains that whole situation on the Pilgrims Page.) at least, that's what corresponds most directly to why that text is all over the place. --[[User:Killjoy|killjoy]] 08:35, 13 March 2007 (PDT)

:: ~~The snippets of~~ :Please explain the text bleeding ~~through~~ from the ~~various pages are a product of~~ pilgrims experiment! Also I highly doubt the ~~Pilgrims Expierement from SBI (The Flash IRC Conversation rather explains that whole situation on~~ numbers refer to the ~~Pilgrims Page.) at least~~track listings anymore, thatwas shot all to hell with 24.19.X showed up. There's tons better theories on what ~~corresponds most directly~~ the numbers are, and a 22-24 track album would have to ~~why that text is all over the place~~be a double disc. --[[User:~~Killjoy~~Velvolver|~~killjoy~~Velvolver]] 08:3543, 13 March 2007 (PDT)

~~Please explain~~ ::::If you look on the backgrounds of many Year Zero sites, you'll see snippets of text ~~bleeding~~ . These come from various places, such as The Stand, Slaughterhouse 5, The Origin of the Species, and so on. In the ~~pilgrims experiment!~~ IRC logs, they mention "mining banned music/books" for their "key text." ~~Also I highly doubt~~ So, it seems entirely plausible to me that the ~~numbers~~ number groups refer to stuff from the track ~~listings anymore~~listing <I>and</I> from the works they're quoting. That said, ~~that was shot all to hell with~~ I personally don't think the 24.19x.x numbers are halo.track.~~X showed~~ letter, even if track > 16 refers to one of the books that shown up. ~~There~~I'~~s tons better theories on what the numbers~~ ve always been pretty skeptical of that theory. The number groups are~~, and a 22-24 track album would have to be a double disc~~too sequential. --[[User:~~Velvolver~~Mr z|~~Velvolver~~Mr z]] 0809:4312, 13 March 2007 (PDT)

Mr z

119

edits