Difference between revisions of "Talk:Nin.com"
Byates5637 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I understand that you say Tony is working on archiving the photos. Well IMO it shouldnt take more then an hour to clean up the archives into a more navigable, bandwidth friendly form. Obviusly Tony has not had that free hour yet, and i did. Why should my contribution be squelched? [[User:Byates5637|Byates5637]] 15:07, 8 August 2007 (PDT) | I understand that you say Tony is working on archiving the photos. Well IMO it shouldnt take more then an hour to clean up the archives into a more navigable, bandwidth friendly form. Obviusly Tony has not had that free hour yet, and i did. Why should my contribution be squelched? [[User:Byates5637|Byates5637]] 15:07, 8 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
+ | :I see where you're coming from. We should come up with a solution. Perhaps what we can do is create an August archive and put the photos dated August 1–7 there and leave the photos dated August 8–14 on the Nin.com page.--[[User:Leo3375|Leo3375]] 15:37, 8 August 2007 (PDT) |
Revision as of 22:37, 8 August 2007
The format for this needs to be changed. There is no reason that all photos from the month of august should appear on the nin.com page. It takes to long and uses up too much bandwidth.
Here is what should happen -
The nin.com page needs to talk about the major changes that have happened throughout the history of nin.com. There should no photos on the main page. There should be a link to the photo archive. When one clicks the link to the photo archive, they should be taken to a page where they can select which days photos they would like to view. I would change this myself, but i cannot figure out how to add a new page.
- Tony is creating archives for the photos. I would bring the issue up with him. Oh, and please sign your comments. Just type four tildes (~) without spaces between them.--Leo3375 09:31, 8 August 2007 (PDT)
I tried to start cleaning up the photo archive only to find that the organizational structure I was working on was deleted within 10 minutes of me creating it. I did not have time to finish my idea because it was erased so quickly. My work did not change or effect anything currently existing on this site. Why would it have to be deleted? Is this really the nature of a wiki? Do you think someones contributions should be immediately deleted before they even come to fruition, simply because they are not a moderator/staff? If that is the case, this wiki is being run more like message forum then a wiki. I am quite dissapointed by this. It is not like this wiki is very thorough or well done to begin with, there is no reason that a users contributions should be immediately deleted.
I understand that you say Tony is working on archiving the photos. Well IMO it shouldnt take more then an hour to clean up the archives into a more navigable, bandwidth friendly form. Obviusly Tony has not had that free hour yet, and i did. Why should my contribution be squelched? Byates5637 15:07, 8 August 2007 (PDT)
- I see where you're coming from. We should come up with a solution. Perhaps what we can do is create an August archive and put the photos dated August 1–7 there and leave the photos dated August 8–14 on the Nin.com page.--Leo3375 15:37, 8 August 2007 (PDT)