Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tapeworm"
(New page: ==New category?== We have a fair few articles for Tapeworm, members and a couple of songs now, would a Tapeworm category be useful? Just wonderin' ~~~~) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==New category?== | ==New category?== | ||
We have a fair few articles for Tapeworm, members and a couple of songs now, would a Tapeworm category be useful? Just wonderin' [[User:Sheepdean|sheepdean]] [[User_talk:Sheepdean|Try to speak as clearly as you can]] 19:08, 26 March 2010 (PDT) | We have a fair few articles for Tapeworm, members and a couple of songs now, would a Tapeworm category be useful? Just wonderin' [[User:Sheepdean|sheepdean]] [[User_talk:Sheepdean|Try to speak as clearly as you can]] 19:08, 26 March 2010 (PDT) | ||
| + | :A tapeworm category would most certainly be useful [[User:Malechite|Malechite]] 09:21, 29 March 2010 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:21, 29 March 2010
New category?
We have a fair few articles for Tapeworm, members and a couple of songs now, would a Tapeworm category be useful? Just wonderin' sheepdean Try to speak as clearly as you can 19:08, 26 March 2010 (PDT)
- A tapeworm category would most certainly be useful Malechite 09:21, 29 March 2010 (PDT)