Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Mailstrom"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
mentioned in the email communication, most of the sites when mentioning things capitalized like this, or with a legit sounding company/organisation name, seem to be provisions for new websites. haven't had luck yet. any help would be great! --[[User:Killjoy|Killjoy]] 01:01, 12 March 2007 (PDT) | mentioned in the email communication, most of the sites when mentioning things capitalized like this, or with a legit sounding company/organisation name, seem to be provisions for new websites. haven't had luck yet. any help would be great! --[[User:Killjoy|Killjoy]] 01:01, 12 March 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Consolidated == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Could there be more mailboxes accessible on Consolidated, perhaps hinted at by the captured email chain? I tried some obvious ones but got nothing. Perhaps someone else is more inspired than I at possible mailboxes to try? Or maybe this is just another rathole? --[[User:Mr z|Mr z]] 09:23, 12 March 2007 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:23, 12 March 2007
Mailstrom
dug around and posted what i could find on the site so far. haven't tried any bruteforcing yet, i might do that at work if i can cut some time between things. (work up at a major registrar, so, lots of web tools readily on hand) --Killjoy 01:01, 12 March 2007 (PDT)
Trinity Episcopalian
mentioned in the email communication, most of the sites when mentioning things capitalized like this, or with a legit sounding company/organisation name, seem to be provisions for new websites. haven't had luck yet. any help would be great! --Killjoy 01:01, 12 March 2007 (PDT)
Consolidated
Could there be more mailboxes accessible on Consolidated, perhaps hinted at by the captured email chain? I tried some obvious ones but got nothing. Perhaps someone else is more inspired than I at possible mailboxes to try? Or maybe this is just another rathole? --Mr z 09:23, 12 March 2007 (PDT)